Colorado Law · Board Fundamentals · Responsible Governance Policies
The Nine Policies Every Colorado Association Must Adopt Under § 38-33.3-209.5
Texas and Florida scatter policy requirements across many sections. Colorado collects them in one list: nine policies every association must adopt, disclose, and follow. For a Colorado board, those nine documents answer most procedural questions before they are asked.
Educational notice. This information is educational in nature and should not be construed as legal advice. Statutory references were verified against the 2024 Colorado Revised Statutes and the enrolled bills named below (HB24-1233 and HB24-1337, effective August 7, 2024; HB25-1043, effective October 1, 2025; HB26-1099, effective August 12, 2026); later amendments are possible. Consult qualified association counsel regarding legal interpretation specific to your jurisdiction.
The Short Version
To promote responsible governance, C.R.S. § 38-33.3-209.5(1) requires every association to keep accurate and complete accounting records and to adopt policies, procedures, and rules and regulations on nine subjects:
- Collection of unpaid assessments.
- Conflicts of interest involving board members.
- Conduct of meetings.
- Enforcement of covenants and rules, including notice and hearing procedures and the schedule of fines.
- Inspection and copying of association records by owners.
- Investment of reserve funds.
- Procedures for adopting and amending policies, procedures, and rules.
- Procedures for addressing disputes between the association and owners.
- Reserve-study disclosure: whether there is a reserve study, a funding plan, and the basis of the study.
The policies are disclosed to owners every year (§ 209.4(2)), are association records owners may inspect (§ 317(1)(f)), and in several cases are a condition of the association’s own authority: no fine is valid without a written fine policy that the association follows (§ 209.5(2)).
Operational Context: Process Written Into Policy
Rather than prescribe every procedure, § 209.5 requires each association to write its own procedures down in nine areas where owner disputes tend to arise, then layers statutory minimums onto several of them. When an owner asks how a fine was decided or why an account went to collections, the answer is meant to be in a policy the owner could have read in advance.
Who This Reaches
Section 209.5 applies to communities created on or after July 1, 1992. For communities created before that date, § 117(1.5) makes §§ 209.4 to 209.7 applicable from January 1, 2006, and § 117(1.7) makes the reserve-study policy in item (IX) applicable from July 1, 2010. Small preexisting cooperatives and planned communities that qualify under § 119, and small new communities that qualify under § 116, are subject only to §§ 105–107 unless their declarations bring them in. Whether a particular community qualifies is a question for association counsel. See the CCIOA overview for the full applicability map.
The Nine Policies, One by One
(I) Collection of unpaid assessments
This is the most heavily regulated of the nine. Under § 209.5(5)(a), an association may not use a collection agency or take legal action to collect unpaid assessments unless it has adopted and follows a written collection policy, which must at a minimum specify: the due date and the date an assessment becomes delinquent; late fees and interest; returned-check charges; the owner’s entitlement to a payment plan under § 316.3; the pre-referral notice of delinquency, sent by certified mail, stating the total due with an accounting, the availability of a payment plan, a contact for the ledger, and a 30-day warning before referral; the method of applying payments; and the legal remedies the association may use. Separate provisions in § 209.5(1.7)(a) require first contact with the owner by certified mail plus two other methods, a record of each contact, and a majority board vote in a recorded vote before an account is referred to a collection agency or attorney. According to its enacted-bill summary, HB25-1043 (effective October 1, 2025) added new advisements to the delinquency notice, including the owner’s right to request the ledger and information about the HOA Information and Resource Center. How these layers fit a particular association’s policy and notices, and any referral decision, are questions for association counsel. The full sequence is covered in Collections in Colorado.
(II) Conflicts of interest involving board members
Section 209.5(4) sets the minimum content: the policy must define or describe the circumstances in which a conflict of interest exists, set procedures for disclosure and recusal, and provide for periodic review of the policy, all consistent with § 310.5. Section 310.5 applies the nonprofit act’s conflicting-interest-transaction rule, § 7-128-501, to association boards. Under that rule, a transaction is not void or voidable solely because of the conflict if the material facts are disclosed and it is approved in good faith by a majority of disinterested directors (or by the members), or if it is fair; the nonprofit act also bars loans to directors and officers.
(III) Conduct of meetings
The meetings policy may refer to the nonprofit code or to other recognized rules and principles. It sits on top of the statutory meeting rules in § 308: open board and committee meetings, the owner’s right to speak on an issue before the board votes (subject to reasonable time limits and a reasonable number of speakers on each side), six permitted executive-session topics, and no rule adoption in executive session. A policy is where an association typically sets its own speaking-time limits and sign-up procedure within those statutory bounds. See Colorado board meetings under § 308.
(IV) Enforcement of covenants and rules
The enforcement policy must include notice and hearing procedures and the schedule of fines. It carries legal weight on its own: under § 209.5(2), no fine is valid unless the association has adopted and follows a written fine policy with a fair and impartial fact-finding process that guarantees notice and an opportunity to be heard before an impartial decision maker — one with no direct personal or financial interest in the outcome, which the statute measures against the benefit or detriment to the general membership. Since HB22-1137, § 209.5(1.7)(b) also generally bars daily fines and daily late fees, sets a 72-hour cure for violations the association reasonably determines threaten public safety or health, and for other violations sets a 30-day cure, a $500 total-fine cap per violation, and two consecutive 30-day cure periods before legal action. See Fines in Colorado.
(V) Inspection and copying of records
The records policy operates within § 317, which lists the association’s records, allows the association to require a written request at least 10 days in advance describing the records with reasonable particularity, and bars it from requiring a statement of proper purpose. The policy is typically where an association sets its request form, inspection location and hours, and copy charges (limited to estimated cost under § 317(4)). See Colorado association records.
(VI) Investment of reserve funds
Reserve investment is the one area where CCIOA expressly imports the nonprofit act’s director standard. Under § 303(2.5), officers and board members investing reserve funds are subject to § 7-128-401: good faith, the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise, and a reasonable belief that the action is in the association’s best interests. “Officer” for this purpose includes anyone the board delegates to, including a managing agent, attorney, or accountant. Section 7-128-401 also permits reliance on officers, counsel, accountants, and committees. How that standard applies to a particular investment decision is a question for counsel and the association’s financial advisers.
(VII) Adoption and amendment of policies, procedures, and rules
This is the policy about the policies. The statute does not prescribe the procedure; it requires the association to have one. Two limits sit outside the policy: no rule may be adopted in executive session (§ 308(6)), and case law limits what a board rule can add to the declaration. In Houston v. Wilson Mesa Ranch Homeowners Ass’n, 2015 COA 113, the Court of Appeals held that a board-adopted procedure banning short-term rentals was unenforceable because the covenants at issue did not prohibit them; on those covenants, a ban required a covenant amendment.
(VIII) Procedures for addressing disputes between the association and owners
Separately from § 209.5, § 124(1)(b) required every association to adopt a written policy on dispute resolution by January 1, 2007, available to owners on request, and encourages the use of mediation or arbitration. Current law encourages, but does not require, pre-suit mediation; a 2025 bill that would have required negotiation and mediation before suit (HB25-1123) did not pass. For disputes over assessments, fines, or fees up to $7,500, § 209.5(9) points owners to small claims court.
(IX) Reserve-study disclosure
The reserve-study policy is a disclosure policy, not a funding mandate. It must state whether the association has a reserve study, whether there is a funding plan and its projected sources, and whether the study rests on a physical and financial analysis; an internal study can qualify. The 2024 CCIOA text contains no requirement that a post-turnover association commission a reserve study or fund reserves to a set level. From August 12, 2026, HB26-1099 requires the declarant to obtain and pay for an independent reserve study projecting 30 years of costs before transferring control, and adds that study to the annual disclosures and the turnover deliverables. Whether the new declarant duty reaches communities already past turnover, or pre-1992 communities, is not resolved in the session-law text CIC-SC reviewed; check the current statute.
How the Policies Connect to Disclosure and Records
| Obligation | Statute | What it means for the policies |
|---|---|---|
| Annual disclosure | § 209.4(2) | The responsible governance policies are among the items made available to owners within 90 days after each fiscal year-end, by website, a literature binder at the principal office, or mail or personal delivery (§ 209.4(3)). |
| Association records | § 317(1)(f) | Governing documents and responsible governance policies are association records owners may inspect and copy. |
| Fine validity | § 209.5(2) | A fine is valid only if the written fine policy exists and is followed. |
| Collections | §§ 209.5(5), (7) | Judicial foreclosure on an assessment delinquency requires compliance with §§ 209.5, 316, and 316.3, among other conditions. |
Why This Matters
Adopted and followed. Section 209.5(2) conditions fines on a policy the association adopts and follows, and § 209.5(5)(a) does the same for collection actions. The written policy is the standard the board’s own process is compared against.
A transition tool. Boards turn over; policies persist. A director who joins mid-term can read the nine policies in an evening. See the policy suite that survives an election.
Review is built in. The conflict policy must provide for periodic review, and the amendments to § 209.5 since 2022 make the collections and enforcement policies the usual candidates for a recurring check against the current statute.
Common Mistakes & Pitfalls
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the responsible governance policies in Colorado?
C.R.S. 38-33.3-209.5(1)(b) requires every association to adopt policies, procedures, and rules and regulations on nine subjects: (I) collection of unpaid assessments; (II) conflicts of interest involving board members; (III) conduct of meetings; (IV) enforcement of covenants and rules, including notice and hearing procedures and the schedule of fines; (V) inspection and copying of association records; (VI) investment of reserve funds; (VII) adoption and amendment of policies, procedures, and rules; (VIII) procedures for addressing disputes between the association and owners; and (IX) reserve-study disclosure.
Do Colorado associations created before 1992 need these policies?
Section 38-33.3-117(1.5) makes section 209.5 applicable to communities created before July 1, 1992 with respect to events on or after January 1, 2006, and section 117(1.7) does the same for the reserve-study policy in item (IX) from July 1, 2010. Small preexisting communities that qualify under section 119 are subject only to sections 105 to 107 unless their declarations bring them in. Whether a particular community qualifies is a question for association counsel.
What happens if an association fines owners without a written fine policy?
Section 38-33.3-209.5(2) generally provides that an association may not fine an owner unless the association has adopted, and follows, a written fine policy with a fair and impartial fact-finding process that guarantees the owner notice and an opportunity to be heard before an impartial decision maker. The enforcement policy is therefore a statutory condition of fining, not just a best practice. Whether a particular fine meets the statute is a question for association counsel.
Does Colorado require associations to have a reserve study?
Not as a general rule. The 2024 CCIOA text requires a reserve-study policy, not a reserve study. The policy must state whether the association has a reserve study, whether there is a funding plan and its projected sources, and whether the study rests on a physical and financial analysis; an internal study can qualify. Separately, from August 12, 2026, HB26-1099 requires the declarant to obtain and pay for an independent 30-year reserve study before transferring control.
What must the conflict-of-interest policy include?
Section 209.5(4) sets minimums: the policy must define or describe the circumstances in which a conflict of interest exists, set procedures for disclosure and recusal, and provide for periodic review of the policy, consistent with section 38-33.3-310.5. Section 310.5 in turn applies the conflicting-interest-transaction rules of the nonprofit act, C.R.S. 7-128-501, to association boards.
Do owners get to see the policies?
Generally, yes. Section 38-33.3-209.4(2) lists the responsible governance policies among the annual disclosures an association makes available to owners within 90 days after each fiscal year-end, and section 38-33.3-317(1)(f) lists them as association records owners may inspect.
Key Takeaways
- Section 209.5(1)(b) requires policies on nine subjects.
- Fining is conditioned on an adopted and followed fine policy (§ 209.5(2)); collection actions on an adopted and followed collection policy (§ 209.5(5)(a)).
- The collections policy has statutory contents (§ 209.5(5)) and has been amended by four bills since 2022.
- The conflict policy must define conflicts, set disclosure and recusal procedures, and provide for periodic review.
- Reserve investment is held to the nonprofit act’s prudent-person standard; the reserve-study policy is a disclosure, not a funding mandate.
- Pre-1992 communities have been covered since January 1, 2006 (item IX since July 1, 2010).
References & Sources
- C.R.S. § 38-33.3-209.5 — Responsible governance policies; due process for imposition of fines. Colorado Revised Statutes 2024, Title 38. crs2024-title-38.pdf
- C.R.S. § 38-33.3-209.4 — Public disclosures required.
- C.R.S. § 38-33.3-124 — Legislative declaration; alternative dispute resolution; dispute resolution policy.
- C.R.S. §§ 38-33.3-303(2.5), -308, -310.5, -316.3, -317 — reserve investment standard; meetings; conflicts of interest; payment plans; records.
- C.R.S. §§ 38-33.3-116, -117, -119 — applicability to small and preexisting communities.
- C.R.S. §§ 7-128-401, 7-128-501 — Colorado Revised Nonprofit Corporation Act: director standards of conduct; conflicting-interest transactions. crs2024-title-07.pdf
- HB22-1137 (ch. 367, eff. Aug. 10, 2022). leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb22-1137
- HB24-1233 (ch. 334, eff. Aug. 7, 2024). leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb24-1233
- HB25-1043 (ch. 433, eff. Oct. 1, 2025). leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1043
- HB25-1123 (postponed indefinitely, May 1, 2025). leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1123
- HB26-1099 (ch. 42, eff. Aug. 12, 2026). leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb26-1099
- Houston v. Wilson Mesa Ranch Homeowners Ass’n, 2015 COA 113, 360 P.3d 255.
Related Resources & Additional Reading from the CIC-SC Library
- Colorado’s Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA): Overview for Board Members
- Fines in Colorado: The Enforcement Policy, Cure Periods, and the Limits After HB22-1137
- Collections in Colorado: The Required Policy, Payment Plans, and Notice Before Referral
- Colorado Association Records Under § 38-33.3-317
- The Policy Suite That Survives an Election
- The Limits of Board Rulemaking: Rules vs. Resolutions
The CIC-SC Board Operating Standard in the Open Library gives Colorado boards a framework for adopting, reviewing, and following written governance policies. Explore the Colorado resource hub.
Disclaimer. This article is published by the Common Interest Community Standards Council for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Statutory references and procedural frameworks are intended to support informed governance, not to substitute for advice from qualified Colorado legal counsel. Boards and managers should consult their association’s attorney about the application of any statute, governing-document provision, or governance-policy decision to their specific circumstances. CIC-SC, its authors, and its members assume no liability for actions taken in reliance on this content.
Published by the Common Interest Community Standards Council (CICSC). Part of the CICSC Member Education Library. © 2026 CICSC. Educational use permitted with attribution.